Earlier today, BoldMouth and Osterman Research published an interesting study on word-of-mouth marketing. You can download a complimentary PDF copy of "Perceptions, Practices and Ethics in Word-0f-Mouth Marketing at this link.
“The goal of the study is to provide organizations interested in, or
even intimidated by, word-of-mouth campaigns with data and guidance
designed to help them integrate this exciting strategy into their
marketing and media plans,” noted BoldMouth CEO Todd Tweedy.
Until
now, the bulk of published research on WOM has been piecemeal, or
appeared as a small section of a more general survey, or was conducted
too long ago to still be useful. Given the rapid changes in the
marketplace, not to mention recent industry buzz around artificially
engineered viral marketing (e.g., incentivized agents) organizations
needed a comprehensive view of this emerging industry.
Nevertheless,
a cursory review of the data from BoldMouth’s study, Perceptions,
Practices & Ethics in Word-of-Mouth Marketing uncovers some
interesting findings:
- A second wave of organizations appear
to be waiting on the sidelines, preparing for the right moment to
launch WOM efforts: 34.7% of study participants stated that they plan
to use WOM marketing, which could expand the industry to the realm of
more than one billion dollars in activity.
- Nearly 90% (89.9%) of all study participants noted that WOM was ethical.
- Based on campaign examples provided by 24.6% of survey participants it
appears as if organizations have a “devotion to promotion” bias when it
comes to WOM.
- 51.2% of organizations are unable to track
performance and 20.9% of organizations lack in-house talent to properly
manage WOM campaigns.
- 65% of respondents noting they don’t
have a WOM plan or are in the process of creating one, it’s likely that
their organizations may have been relegating WOM to only support
tactical marketing duties.
- • Nearly 64% of all survey
respondents noted that WOM is either “very important” or “extremely
important” to their overall marketing plans.
- Close to 60%
of all respondents noted that they never use outside experts. This
reliance on in-house talent can lead to confusion over campaign success
metrics and contribute to future barriers to secure adequate campaign
budgets.
- Face-to-face communications received the highest
WOM effectiveness rating (86% or “extremely effective”), however, when
online WOM marketing strategies are combined, this aggregated category
of responses under the heading of Online WOM Marketing Strategies
suggest as high, if not a higher, cumulative effectiveness rating than
face-to-face communications.
Tweedy noted that, “The lack of
more widespread attention to planning implies that a systematic
approach to WOM marketing does not exist. Perhaps the greatest risk to
not having a WOM plan in place is how organizations will deal with the
likelihood of negative word-of-mouth. Based on study data, we believe
the percentage of organizations that note “criticism from customers
about campaigns” (7%) as a problem is likely to increase over the next
twelve months as more organizations experiment with WOM.”