On 7/8/09, three Greenpeace activities climbed on Mt. Rushmore and unfurled a giant banner with President Obama's profile and message saying “America Honors Leaders, Not Politicians. Stop Global Warming.” Immediately, news of this action spread around the world. The stunt was particularly effective at garnering media attention for three reasons:
- It took place on one of America's most iconic memorials.
- It's bold size and juxtaposition of President Obama vs. great past presidents created a powerful image.
- It provided a strong visual image to illustrate the passion of environmentalists regarding the talks about global warming at the G8 meeting in Italy.
A journalist for the Rapid City Journal (SD), who had found my post in this blog about publicity stunts, called me to ask about the efficacy of the publicity stunt and ran my comments in a story about the Greenpeace effort. The article observed:
“I’m guessing activist groups around the world are going to be looking
at this saying, ‘hmm, this might be a case study for us,’” said Patrick
Galvin of Galvin Communications in Portland, Ore. Galvin specializes
in helping businesses build buzz without expensive advertising.
Greenpeace
snapped a photo of the banner with an aerial camera, and a video camera
operator near Highway 244 at the memorial broadcast live footage of the
incident online.
Greenpeace released a well-timed statement
about the demonstration and placed it prominently on its Web site,
which included live updates posted on Twitter, an online microblogging
site.
Media organizations throughout the country quickly picked
up the video and still images supplied by Greenpeace. The video, images
and Twitter messages fleshed out news articles which initially took
much of their information from a Greenpeace statement issued moments
before the climbers unrolled the banner.
Galvin said he also was
impressed by the activists’ adept use of Twitter. Before the event,
friends and supporters of the organization and the climbers on Mount
Rushmore eagerly spoke of the event on the online site Twitter in the
hours and minutes leading up the banner drop.
Several of the climbers broadcast their location to the world via Twitter as they rappelled onto Abraham Lincoln’s stone face.
“Twitter
has become this platform that, more than anything else, people are
attracted to it for its immediacy,” Galvin said. “Having one of the
rappellers tweeting about it was brilliant.”
In a subsequent interview that I provided the same day to The Christian Science Monitor, which appeared on 7/8/09, I observed that the Greenpeace effort might not be a total success:
Galvin said in terms of communicating a message effectively, he’d give it a “nine out of ten.” But the jury is still out he says on whether the overall strategy will work. That’s because Greenpeace broke the law and if any damage to Mt. Rushmore was done, it could be a big negative for the organization.
“If there was any defacement, if that banner whipped a piece of Abraham Lincoln’s nose, then the message will get diluted very quickly,” he said. “I’d give it a qualified thumbs-up.”
Since those articles appeared, it appears as if the Greenpeace publicity stunt served its purpose. Traffic to the Greenpeace website spiked as the story was reported around the world in thousands of blog and media outlets. The global warming debate seemed to garner a surge of discussion. The apparent lack of damage to Mt. Rushmore and quick release of the Greenpeace activists who carried out the stunt did not engender any long term negative consequences for the organization.
