A couple of days ago, there was a Cranky Consumer review in the Wall Street Journal comparing online diaper companies. Reviewer Eileen Gunn gave Diapers.com her highest praise saying "Diapers.com is the Web site we are most likely to order from
again. Prices amounted to 17 cents a diaper for Pampers and 19 cents for
Seventh Generation -- the lowest prices we found. Shipping was free. And an
order placed late Thursday night arrived Monday afternoon. It doesn't get much
more straightforward than that." When I finished the story, I imagined the high-fives that most have been exchanged in the marketing department at Diapers.com when the story first appeared.
One of my pet peeves about PR is that too many companies pat themselves on the back when they land great press. Sadly, they don't realize that the lasting benefit of PR is its residual value. Smart companies understand this, and Diapers.com is one of them. A link to the story is prominently featured in the middle of the home page and links to the full article which has the best quotes highlighted for quick reading. I'm sure that the credibility of the article will convince many people checking out the Diapers.com website for the first time to order since it's more credible than any copy that the company could generate.
Oddly, on the Diapers.com website, it is hard to find the company's press room. There is no link to it from the site's home page. Only after searching around for a few minutes did I find a link to an About Us section in small print at the bottom of the home page which subsequently links to a Press Room featuring an impressive array of awards and articles. There's absolutely no reason that such great information should be so buried within the company's website since it does a lot to sway a consumer.
Of course,it's nice to get good press. But it's more helpful when the good press comes in the form of a well-researched article. This was not one of them.
http://realitybitesback.blogspot.com/2007/10/wall-street-journals-cranky-consumer.html
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2007 at 03:57 PM
Steve,
Thanks for taking the time time to comment on my blog post. I enjoyed reading the response to the WSJ article on your blog and you make some excellent points. It does indeed seem like the reporter made some mistakes. However, this certainly doesn't diminish from the PR value of the article from Diapers.com's perspective. I wonder why I haven't seen a note from Amazon to the Wall Street Journal clarifying the pricing situation. If Amazon's PR department hasn't responded, they're asleep at the wheel. Thanks for visiting!
Best,
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Galvin | November 01, 2007 at 11:21 AM